“In this place, whether you think about it from a tribal point of view, a wildlife point of view, a water point of view, or an economic point of view, uranium mining just doesn’t matter. According to the Grand Canyon Trust, mining could threaten the entire industry.
#TRIBAL HEALTH SCRIBE JOBS NEAR ME DRIVERS#
Outdoor recreation and tourism focused on the natural resources of the Grand Canyon area are major drivers of the regional economy, supporting more than 9,000 jobs and generating more than $160 million in annual state and local tax revenue. marginal in the regional and national economy. said Amber Reimondo, director of energy for the Grand Canyon Trust.Īccording to the Grand Canyon TrustThe US has enough uranium in storage to meet military needs through 2060, and the region contains less than one percent of US uranium reserves, meaning Grand Canyon production would play a role. “Anyone who claims that we need to be able to mine uranium near the Grand Canyon in order to be independent from Russia is, at best, exaggerating the uranium potential of this region and possibly just taking advantage of a geopolitical crisis to benefit their own bottom line.
Since the war in Ukraine began, more pro-mining groups have called for an increase in domestic uranium production. According to the letter, a ban on uranium in the Grand Canyon area would cost local economies money and jobs, as well as add a potential burden to domestic energy production. The letter, which was endorsed by dozens of mining and economic organizations, asserted that domestic uranium was crucial to national security, economic growth and manufacturing. In 2018, nearly two dozen members of Congress sent a letter President Trump will reopen the Grand Canyon asking to extract uranium. Since then, the mining industry, which has hundreds of active mining concessions in the area, has tried to overturn the ban in court without success. The two-decade ban was intended to give scientists time to study the potential impact of uranium mining on the region. In 2012, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar signed a 20-year ban on new uranium mining on approximately one million acres of federal land around the Grand Canyon. Mining advocates say US uranium production is important for energy independence, a strong economy and national defense. Grijalva, author of the actĪdvocates say the Grand Canyon is home to only a small fraction of the US’s known uranium reserves and a permanent ban would not affect national security or the economy. “If we really want to protect this treasure, Arizona’s water and the people who depend on that water for their lives, we need permanent protections to have the force of law,” said House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Raul M. On protecting the state’s clean water supply, 96 percent of Arizonans say it’s a top priority, the survey indicates. Sixty-seven percent of those voters said they supported the law, while 46 percent said they strongly supported it. Grand Canyon Protection Acta bill that would permanently ban the practice.Ĭarried out by GQR, an opinion research and polling firm, 600 registered Arizona voters were asked specific questions about the Grand Canyon Protection Act, which passed the House last year but has yet to pass the Senate. A new poll of likely voters in Arizona indicates strong bipartisan support for a permanent ban on new uranium mining near the Grand Canyon, and hope that the law will pass.
0 kommentar(er)
